These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
134 related items for PubMed ID: 4880167
1. [Comparative study and clinical significance of some methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria]. Varga M, Dóbiás G, Faragó G. Orv Hetil; 1967 Jan 15; 108(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 4880167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Critical examinations on the differential diagnostic value of Griess test and TTC-test in comparison with a simplified bacteriological proof of clinically significant bacteriurias]. Gernand K, Mäter H. Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1970 Apr 23; 25(16):754-9. PubMed ID: 4921772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of triphenyl tetrazolium chloride test for detection of significant bacteriuria. Hardas UD, Junnarkar RV. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol; 1969 Jan 23; 12(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 4905527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Experiences with uricult, a new method for the quantitative determination of bacteria in urine]. Breitfellner G. Wien Med Wochenschr; 1970 Apr 04; 120(14):235-43. PubMed ID: 4933975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mass detection of significant bacteriuria. An improved triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) technique. Resnick B, Cella RL, Soghikian K, Lieberman AH, Weil E. Arch Intern Med; 1969 Aug 04; 124(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 4894444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A screening test for the detection of significant bacteriurias]. Van den Bossche H, Ringoir S, Daneels R. Belg Tijdschr Geneesk; 1965 Nov 01; 21(21):996-1000. PubMed ID: 5841200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Validity of the triphenyl-tetrazolium test for rapid diagnosis of significant bacteriuria]. Lechi A, Diana L, Chisesi T. Policlinico Prat; 1968 Sep 23; 75(39):1253-8. PubMed ID: 4878848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative studies on various methods for quantitative bacteriologic urine diagnostics]. Schaal KP, Ostermann-Myrau M. Z Urol Nephrol; 1971 Dec 23; 64(12):919-28. PubMed ID: 4946606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contribution to the diagnosis of bacteriuria]. Günther H, Jürgens H. Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1968 Jun 20; 23(25):1154-9. PubMed ID: 4879541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Miniaturized culture pads in the detection of bacteriuria. Coltman KM. Practitioner; 1982 Apr 20; 226(1366):751-2, 754, 757. PubMed ID: 7045850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of four recent techniques for screening urines for the presence of significant numbers of bacteria. Wright LA. J Med Lab Technol; 1968 Oct 20; 25(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 4883570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [New methods for the diagnosis of bacteriauria]. Navarrete RV. Munch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Mar 28; 111(13):720-4. PubMed ID: 4889028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnosis of non-specific urinary infections. Comparative evaluation of the test with triphenyltetrazolium chloride and quantitative urinoculture]. Marković V, Macura D, Gajić S. Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1969 Mar 28; 96(7):753-60. PubMed ID: 5192620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of seven screening tests for the detection of significant bacteriuria. Teoh H, Harper J, Davis G. Pathology; 1973 Oct 28; 5(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 4131075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [On the value of chemical screening tests for the detection of true (significant) bacteriuria]. Berecz M, Sobel M, Domány Z, Czeizel E. Orv Hetil; 1968 Sep 01; 109(35):1945-6. PubMed ID: 5714840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]