These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 4923566

  • 1. The assessment of aerosol concentration by means of the Andersen sampler.
    Peto S, Powell EO.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1970 Sep; 33(3):582-98. PubMed ID: 4923566
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M, Miyamae T.
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Andersen eight-stage and two-stage viable air samplers.
    Curtis SE, Balsbaugh RK, Drummond JG.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 Jan; 35(1):208-9. PubMed ID: 341808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Improved large-volume sampler for the collection of bacterial cells from aerosol.
    White LA, Hadley DJ, Davids DE, Naylor R.
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Mar; 29(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 803820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of a simple device for bacteriological sampling of respirator-generated aerosols.
    Ryan KJ, Mihalyi SF.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Feb; 5(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 403199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
    Casewell MW, Fermie PG, Thomas C, Simmons NA.
    J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [A method for detecting bacteria of an unknown type in the air].
    Kotenok IaF, Kopysov VA.
    Gig Sanit; 1990 Oct; (10):13-6. PubMed ID: 2074016
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A modification of the Andersen sampler for use in occupied environments.
    Lidwell OM, Noble WC.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1965 Aug; 28(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 5317979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
    Zimmerman NJ, Reist PC, Turner AG.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A safe method of exposing microthreads in the open air.
    Druett HA.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1971 Sep; 34(3):655-8. PubMed ID: 4945524
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Direct method for determining the viability of a freshly generated mixed bacterial aerosol.
    Green LH, Green GM.
    Appl Microbiol; 1968 Jan; 16(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 4865908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Universal flow sheets for the laboratory analysis of the microflora in the air].
    Evdokimov VL.
    Gig Sanit; 1977 Jun; (6):68-74. PubMed ID: 326628
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [A simple testing installation for the production of aerosols with constant bacteria-contaminated concentrations].
    Herbst M, Lehmhus H, Oldenburg B, Orlowski C, Ohgke H.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Apr; 177(3-4):257-68. PubMed ID: 6670401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.