These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 4939124

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efficiency of a multitest system (Enterotube) for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Titsworth E, Grunberg E, Beskid G, Cleeland R, Delorenzo WF.
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Aug; 18(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 4979941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT, Latimer JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF, Crovatto M, Chiaradia V, Marchi MP.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Brown SD, Washington JA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Dec; 8(6):695-9. PubMed ID: 370143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multi-biochemical test system for distinguishing enteric and other gram-negative bacilli.
    Elston HR, Baudo JA, Stanek JP, Schaab M.
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Sep; 22(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 4940877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P, Carbone M, Fera MT, Teti G.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983 Sep; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the redesigned Enterotube and its interpretation systems.
    Wüst J, Kayser FH.
    Pathol Microbiol (Basel); 1974 Sep; 40(6):316-25. PubMed ID: 4604453
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Washington JA, Yu PK, Martin WJ.
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Sep; 22(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 4940867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Davis JR, Stager CE, Wende RD, Qadri SM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of conventional methods, the R-B system, and modified R-B system as guides to the major divisions of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Isenberg HD, Painter BG.
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Dec; 22(6):1126-34. PubMed ID: 4944807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.