These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
109 related items for PubMed ID: 4945524
1. A safe method of exposing microthreads in the open air. Druett HA. J Appl Bacteriol; 1971 Sep; 34(3):655-8. PubMed ID: 4945524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [A method for detecting bacteria of an unknown type in the air]. Kotenok IaF, Kopysov VA. Gig Sanit; 1990 Oct; (10):13-6. PubMed ID: 2074016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The assessment of aerosol concentration by means of the Andersen sampler. Peto S, Powell EO. J Appl Bacteriol; 1970 Sep; 33(3):582-98. PubMed ID: 4923566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Universal flow sheets for the laboratory analysis of the microflora in the air]. Evdokimov VL. Gig Sanit; 1977 Jun; (6):68-74. PubMed ID: 326628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Method of determination of general air contamination by microbes]. Kotenok IaF, Gavrilov OG. Gig Sanit; 1993 May; (5):71-2. PubMed ID: 8063178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Improvement of a portable device for isolation of bacteria from the air under study]. Kotenok IaF, Kopysov VA. Gig Sanit; 1996 May; (4):50-2. PubMed ID: 9005192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator. Furuhashi M, Miyamae T. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preliminary bacteriological air studies in hospital wards by the Szczeblewski and Bakowski method]. Kunert A, Rzepecka H. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1978 Mar; 29(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 349670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Results of a trial of a new kind of bacterial trap]. Rudenko NM. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1970 Sep; 47(9):124-7. PubMed ID: 4932818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental comparison of the methods of air sampling in health and hygiene research during bacteriological studies]. Tikhomirov VK, Pavlovskiĭ GM, Tarasenko VM. Gig Sanit; 1986 Apr; (4):68-70. PubMed ID: 3519377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Device for the determination of bacterial air contamination]. Szczeblewski B, Bakowski S. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1978 Apr; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 349671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative characteristics of methods for determining the bacterial contamination of the air]. Sokolinskiĭ LM, Maksimov VF. Gig Sanit; 1984 Jun; (6):47-9. PubMed ID: 6381239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BACTERIA-TRAPPING DEVICES IN THE DETERMINATION OF BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS OF AEROSOLS]. KIKTENKO VS, KUDRIAVTSEV SI, PUSHCHIN NI. Gig Sanit; 1963 Oct; 28():45-8. PubMed ID: 14187229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a high-volume aerosol collection system for the identification of air-borne micro-organisms. Radosevich JL, Wilson WJ, Shinn JH, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL. Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 34(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11874535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [One probable source of the airborne spread of enteric-group bacteria]. Kotenok IaF. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1989 Aug; (8):109-11. PubMed ID: 2686296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]