These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

83 related items for PubMed ID: 5021363

  • 41. Screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria of pregnancy to prevent pyelonephritis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis.
    Rouse DJ, Andrews WW, Goldenberg RL, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 7784004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. A comparison of screening methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria.
    Ingram GB, Wade WG.
    J Ir Med Assoc; 1966 Oct; 59(352):118-20. PubMed ID: 5342003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. [Use of Uriglox for the diagnosis of bacteriuria in pediatric practice].
    Velemínský M, Hausner O.
    Cesk Pediatr; 1975 May; 30(5):243-4. PubMed ID: 1164774
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. [Methodical problems of the diagnosis of bacteriuria. The importance and value of so-called screening tests].
    Szabó M, Somló G, Sepp J.
    Orv Hetil; 1966 Dec 25; 107(52):2449-53. PubMed ID: 5341048
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. [Mass screening of pregnant women for true symptomless (significant) bacteriuria].
    Murányi J, Kusnyerik G.
    Orv Hetil; 1982 Apr 11; 123(15):919-20. PubMed ID: 7078948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. [Letter: Screening of school children for bacteriuria].
    Péter F, Aprili Z, Jójárt G, Grondzsák E.
    Orv Hetil; 1974 Sep 29; 115(39):2332-3. PubMed ID: 4410006
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. [Significant bacteriuria. Assessment of a new diagnostic method (Uricult) and presentation of a simple quantitative pipetter dilution method].
    Orellana M, Linde J, Schmidt V.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1970 Oct 15; 132(42):1966-70. PubMed ID: 4919800
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. [UTIscreen versus UROQUICK: two semiautomatic systems for bacteriuria detection].
    Milagro A, Moles B, Seoane A, Navascués J, Blasco M, García-Moya JB.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999 Oct 15; 17(8):398-400. PubMed ID: 10563088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. [Problems and possibilities of bacteriological urine diagnosis in the determination of asymptomatic bacteriuria within the limits of routine pregnancy examination].
    Wagenbichler P, Rotter M.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1969 Oct 31; 81(44):789-96. PubMed ID: 5356198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: urinalysis versus urine culture.
    Chongsomchai C, Piansriwatchara E, Lumbiganon P, Pianthaweechai K.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr 31; 82(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 10410499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. [Simple test for determination of the degree of bacteriuria].
    Anshelevich IuV.
    Lab Delo; 1969 Apr 31; 3():175-7. PubMed ID: 4185186
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.