These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

785 related items for PubMed ID: 507063

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
    Baron CH.
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Carroll PR.
    Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases.
    Baron CH.
    Am J Law Med; 1978 Dec; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint.
    Relman AS.
    Am J Law Med; 1978 Oct; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Litigating life and death.
    Rhoden NK.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Dec; 102(2):375-446. PubMed ID: 10294608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
    Gindes D.
    Am J Law Med; 1989 Dec; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
    Norris JA.
    Am J Law Med; 1979 Dec; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
    Bennett SA.
    Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Annas GJ.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
    Suber DG, Tabor WJ.
    JAMA; 1982 Nov 12; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Defining the family's role in treatment decisions.
    Veatch RM.
    Health Prog; 1986 Oct 12; 67(8):50-2. PubMed ID: 10279011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care.
    Rodriguez-Osorio CA, Dominguez-Cherit G.
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Dec 12; 14(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 19005314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
    Gilfix M, Raffin TA.
    West J Med; 1984 Sep 12; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.