These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

81 related items for PubMed ID: 5119040

  • 21. Model of discharge rate from auditory nerve fibers responding to electrical stimulation of the cochlea: identification of cues for current and time-interval coding.
    O'Leary SJ, Clark GM, Tong YC.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():121-3. PubMed ID: 7668601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The crossed acoustic response.
    Douek EE, Gibson WP, Humphries KN.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975 Sep; 96(3-4):121-6. PubMed ID: 1215700
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Testing for "recruitment" by electrocochleography. Preliminary results.
    Portmann M, Aran JM, Lagourgue P.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973 Sep; 82(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 4685567
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Human auditory nerve action potentials.
    Coats AC.
    Neurology; 1970 Apr; 20(4):418. PubMed ID: 5535083
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Electrocochleography in young children].
    Negrevergne M.
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1974 Jan; 23(1):49-50 passim. PubMed ID: 4278542
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Retrolabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy with simultaneous monitoring of eighth nerve action potentials and electrocochleography.
    Silverstein H, Wazen J, Norrell H, Hyman SM.
    Am J Otol; 1984 Oct; 5(6):552-5. PubMed ID: 6517148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Electric function potentials of the auditory analyzer].
    Sekula J, Trabka J.
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1967 Oct; 18(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 6062744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Electrophysiologic studies on the peripheral part of the human ear, using appropriate computer programs].
    Spreng M, Bumm P, Keidel WD, Wiegand HP.
    Pflugers Arch; 1969 Oct; 307(2):R134. PubMed ID: 5814790
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The auditory system in humans.
    Doyle JH.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Mar; 76(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9086641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Comparison of electrocohleographic and audiographic thresholds. Statistical study].
    Aran JM, Charlet de Sauvage R, Pèlerin J.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Mar; 92(9):477-91. PubMed ID: 5159697
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A comparison between human and animal cochlear potentials.
    Kupperman R.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:739-51. PubMed ID: 5148988
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.