These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

105 related items for PubMed ID: 513047

  • 1. Current status of the contraction stress test.
    Druzin ML, Paul RH, Gratacos J.
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Nov; 23(5):222-6. PubMed ID: 513047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [A study on oxytocin challenge test of the fetus with quantitative tocodynamometry determined by contraction index (author's transl)].
    Sawazumi K.
    Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1981 Jul; 33(7):987-95. PubMed ID: 7304139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [The antepartum oxytocin fetal assessment challenge test 1,827 case histories. Significance of "prepathological testing". "Results" (author's transl)].
    Novo-Dominguez A, Sandoval C, Botella-Llusia J.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1978 Jul; 7(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 712044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Observations on fetal monitoring].
    Frontera F.
    Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1976 Jul; 81(4-6):115-47. PubMed ID: 1052873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Nipple stimulation contraction stress test and oxytocin challenge test in evaluating fetal well being in high risk pregnancy].
    Ihara Y, Shimizu T, Inoue K, Ando N.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 41(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 2926191
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ.
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fetal activity acceleration determination for the evaluation of fetal reserve.
    Lee CY, Di Loreto PC, Logrand B.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jul; 48(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 934570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The non-stress versus stress test. Contraposition or integration? Role of fetal sound stimulation].
    Bouché M, Ravazzolo MP.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1984 May; 36(5):251-8. PubMed ID: 6472719
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic studies and fetal assessment in advanced extrauterine pregnancy.
    Hertz RH, Timor-Tritsch I, Sokol RJ, Zador I.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jul; 50(1 Suppl):62s-65s. PubMed ID: 876546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.