These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


122 related items for PubMed ID: 514476

  • 1. Visual field differences in perception of the vertical with and without a visible frame of reference.
    Pitblado C.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(3-4):381-92. PubMed ID: 514476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hemispheric laterality effects in the enumeration of visually presented collections of dots by children.
    Young AW, Bion PJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 431816
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetry: the effect of orientation on same-different comparison.
    Hock HS, Kronseder C, Sissons SK.
    Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(5):723-7. PubMed ID: 7312158
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interhemispheric asymmetry in facial expression recognition: relationship to field-dependence.
    Manning L.
    Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):601-10. PubMed ID: 3816244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Functional hemispheric asymmetries in perception of digit and line orientation orientation (author's transl)].
    Hatta T.
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1976 Dec; 47(5):268-76. PubMed ID: 1035689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Right hemisphere language and cognitive deficit in sinistrals?
    Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Taylor MJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 1981 Dec; 19(1):113-32. PubMed ID: 7231656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation.
    Sasanuma S, Kobayashi Y.
    Neuropsychologia; 1978 Dec; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition.
    Fudin R, Masterson CC.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words.
    Graves R, Landis T, Goodglass H.
    Neuropsychologia; 1981 Apr; 19(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 7231670
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Task requirements and hemispheric asymmetry for the processing of single letters.
    Niederbuhl J, Springer SP.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979 Apr; 17(6):689-92. PubMed ID: 522983
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Oral report of words and word approximations presented to the left or right visual field.
    Axelrod S, Haryadi T.
    Brain Lang; 1977 Oct; 4(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 922468
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Functional dissociation of the hemispheres using foveal visual input.
    Haun F.
    Neuropsychologia; 1978 Oct; 16(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 748809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Lateralization effects in response to words and non-words.
    Shanon B.
    Cortex; 1979 Dec; 15(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 548218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effects of display and report order asymmetries on lateralized word recognition.
    Boles DB.
    Brain Lang; 1985 Sep; 26(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 4052739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Visual perception in normal children and adults II. Correlation between dominance of visual field and dominance of the eye].
    Ichiba N.
    No To Hattatsu; 1989 May; 21(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 2736125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.