These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 522678

  • 1. Representative Hollister's interests center on health care legislation, reform.
    Weddon W.
    Mich Med; 1979 Dec; 78(35):689-90. PubMed ID: 522678
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. HB 4555 had center stage in state's medical legislation this year.
    Maldonado WE.
    Mich Med; 1980 Aug; 79(23):408-9. PubMed ID: 7402095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system.
    Cohn A.
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Michigan law treats Blues plan like public agency, not private institution.
    LaViolette S.
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10250327
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues.
    Haradine J.
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
    Steele CJ.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988 Mar; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts.
    Burda D.
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep 01; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes.
    Heitler G, Ader M.
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep 01; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Va. report: drop special rules for Blues.
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Nov 04; 82(44):2, 26. PubMed ID: 10238875
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans.
    Richman D.
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul 04; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
    Burda D.
    Hospitals; 1986 Nov 05; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.".
    Burda D.
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov 20; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. FTC eyes ban of M.D. input into HMOs, Blues.
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec 20; 9(12):32. PubMed ID: 503022
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Challenge to Blues' tax-exemption seen as signal to healthcare industry.
    Anderson HJ, Baldwin MF.
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Dec 06; 15(25):18-20. PubMed ID: 10274654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Medicare recoupment of alleged "overpayments".
    Wilcox DP.
    Tex Med; 1987 Dec 06; 83(12):51-3. PubMed ID: 3321523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Recoupment: fear, confusion, and a court date.
    Jones DB.
    Tex Med; 1987 Dec 06; 83(12):47-9. PubMed ID: 3321522
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. FTC eyes hospital-BC relations.
    Simler SL.
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Jun 06; 9(6):28. PubMed ID: 440277
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ohio court upholds merger, finds bidding plan illegal.
    Baker C.
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun 14; 8(12):5-7. PubMed ID: 10272361
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.