These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 526886

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Superiority of a soil debris isolation method over a beet seed colonization method for assay of Rhizoctonia solani at high soil inoculum densities.
    Roberts DL, Herr LJ.
    Can J Microbiol; 1979 Jan; 25(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 427651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In field survival of Rhizoctonia solani in soil and in diseased sugarbeets.
    Herr LJ.
    Can J Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 22(7):983-8. PubMed ID: 963618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of Sugar Beet Variety and Nonhost Plant on Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IIIB Soil Inoculum Potential Measured in Soil DNA Extracts.
    Schulze S, Koch HJ, Märländer B, Varrelmann M.
    Phytopathology; 2016 Sep; 106(9):1047-54. PubMed ID: 27143412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani diseases of sugar beet by antagonistic and plant growth-promoting yeasts.
    El-Tarabily KA.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004 Sep; 96(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 14678160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The importance of weeds for the transmission of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. III. The influence of weeds on the infestation of potatoes by Rhizoctonia solani (author's transl)].
    Griesbach E, Eisbein K.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg; 1975 Sep; 130(8):745-60. PubMed ID: 1243847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of inoculum density and soil tillage on the development and severity of rhizoctonia root rot.
    Schroeder KL, Paulitz TC.
    Phytopathology; 2008 Mar; 98(3):304-14. PubMed ID: 18944081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Integrated options for the management of black root rot of strawberry caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.
    Asad-Uz-Zaman M, Bhuiyan MR, Khan MA, Alam Bhuiyan MK, Latif MA.
    C R Biol; 2015 Feb; 338(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 25595298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. First Evidence of a Binucleate Rhizoctonia as the Causal Agent of Dry Rot Canker of Sugar Beet in Nebraska.
    Harveson RM, Bolton MD.
    Plant Dis; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1508. PubMed ID: 30708502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Control of Rhizoctonia solani in Sugar Beet and Effect of Fungicide Application and Plant Cultivar on Inoculum Potential in the Soil.
    Bartholomäus A, Mittler S, Märländer B, Varrelmann M.
    Plant Dis; 2017 Jun; 101(6):941-947. PubMed ID: 30682924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Effect of plant residues on the parasitic activity of soil-borne pathogens and the saprophytic microflora of the soil. II. Influence of a second crop cultivation one the incidence of Rhizoctonia solani (author's transl].
    Naumann K, Lange-de la Camp M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg; 1977 Jun; 132(5-6):573-92. PubMed ID: 602482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Agroecological factors correlated to soil DNA concentrations of Rhizoctonia in dryland wheat production zones of Washington state, USA.
    Okubara PA, Schroeder KL, Abatzoglou JT, Paulitz TC.
    Phytopathology; 2014 Jul; 104(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 24915426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.