These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 5275969

  • 41. Inlay versus and amalgam restorations.
    Nuckles DB.
    S C Dent J; 1980; 38(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 7010569
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. [Margin sealing and other details on dental restorations, with special attention to the peridontium].
    Nyström PE.
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1969 Feb; 79(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 5260994
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Restoring a deep gingival wall with amalgam for a cast gold restoration.
    Liatukas EL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1968 Apr; 19(4):410-2. PubMed ID: 5237530
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Composite resins to restore mutilated teeth.
    Spalten RG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Mar; 25(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 5276855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Mar; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. [Pins, indications and technique. Rationale for their use].
    Padros Fradera E.
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1978 Mar; 26(4):227-44. PubMed ID: 286388
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. The retentive strength of slots with different width and depth versus pins.
    Chan CC, Chan KC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Nov; 58(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 3479552
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Pin retention for amalgam restoration.
    Sherman B.
    Temple Dent Rev; 1969 Nov; 39(2):4-10. PubMed ID: 5261787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond.
    Fischer GM, Stewart GP, Panelli J.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. [Porcelain inlays as an amalgam substitute? A report on the experience after 5 years of clinical use].
    Jäger K, Wirz J, Schmidli F.
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990 Aug; 100(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 2263939
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The number and location of threaded pins for optimal resistance and retention in premolar amalgam restorations.
    Harrington WG, Moon PC, Crockett WD.
    Va Dent J; 1982 Oct; 59(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 6964007
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Amalgam onlay restoration.
    Doukoudakis S, Doukoudakis A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 1791559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Amalgam restoration of posterior teeth before endodontic treatment.
    Barkmeier WW, Murrin JR, Anderson RW.
    J Endod; 1980 Feb; 6(2):446-9. PubMed ID: 6935345
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.