These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Nursing leaders in Indiana react to the ANA Position on Nursing Education. Dehoyos A, Whitehurst M, Dehoyos G. Am J Nurs; 1968 Nov; 68(11):2390-5. PubMed ID: 5187955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ANA Position Paper--issues and problems in the state of Washington. Ridgway EM. Wash State J Nurs; 1968 Jan; 40(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5184243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ANA rebukes opposition, reaffirms support of entry-into-practice stand. Simler SL. Mod Healthc; 1980 Jul; 10(7):52. PubMed ID: 10248398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The MLPNA position. Britton L. Mich Hosp; 1979 Oct; 15(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 10277992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Post convention views on the ANA position paper. Education for nursing in the year 2000. McGriff EP. Md Nurs News; 1967 Oct; 36(3):3-13. PubMed ID: 5183035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ANA testifies on Nurse Training Act. Bauknecht VL. Am Nurse; 1980 May; 12(5):2. PubMed ID: 6899732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 1985 proposal : LP/VNs are not alone in their opposition. Friedman FB. J Pract Nurs; 1979 May; 29(5):35, 39. PubMed ID: 255159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ANA agrees, differs on points in IOM nursing study. McCarty P. Am Nurse; 1983 May; 15(5):5, 14, 19. PubMed ID: 6551158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The 1985 debate: college does not make a better nurse. Butts ME. J Pract Nurs; 1979 Aug; 29(8):18, 38-9. PubMed ID: 257008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]