These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
132 related items for PubMed ID: 529951
21. [Are hearing tests necessary during continued work in a noisy environment?]. Schwetz F. Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1972; 106(7):344-52. PubMed ID: 4638572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Hearing fatigue in Békésy audiometry as means of differential diagnosis]. Baldus S, Gastpar H. HNO; 1970 Jun; 18(6):185-7. PubMed ID: 5514151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [High-frequency audiometry for the early diagnosis of occupational acoustic trauma]. Bartsch R, Brückner C, Dieroff HG. Z Gesamte Hyg; 1989 Jun; 35(8):493-6. PubMed ID: 2815879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population. Smits C, Kramer SE, Houtgast T. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss]. Janisch R, Jerábek J. Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Audiograms from coalminers of the Anna mine (author's transl)]. Bründel KH, Hartung G. HNO; 1978 May; 26(5):174-9. PubMed ID: 659276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry. Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC. Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Problems arising from studies concerning the convergence of noise-related hardness of hearing and hearing problems of other origins with special attention paid to agerelated hardness of hearing (author's transl)]. Brusis T. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Dec; 52(12):915-29. PubMed ID: 4273207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)]. Welzl-Müller K. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Stapedial reflexes in presbyacusis and occupational deafness]. Philion Y, Lescouflair G. Audiology; 1977 Mar; 16(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 836252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Occupational hearing loss as probability diagnosis (author's transl)]. Welleschik B. Wien Klin Wochenschr Suppl; 1980 Mar; 120():1-13. PubMed ID: 6936986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Mar; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]