These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 531283

  • 1. [Composition of the data on optical correction obtained with classical methods and with the Dioptron II].
    Pop M, Cârstocea B, Horge I, Mitrea C, Pop C, Olteanu M.
    Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol; 1979; 23(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 531283
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures].
    Poletti J, Courrejou C.
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Should not we correct some of Donder's assumptions?].
    Rozenblium IuZ.
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1999 Apr; 115(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 10207323
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Eye and eyeglasses].
    Reiner J.
    Buch Augenarzt; 1972 Apr; 59():1-132. PubMed ID: 5063498
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Subjective refraction assessment. II: Monocular fine adjustment].
    Friedburg D, Krause K.
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Aug; 99(8):657-63; quiz 664-5, 667. PubMed ID: 12227282
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Free-vision refraction determination].
    Reiner J.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Jan; 186(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 3974163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P, Synek S, Petrová S, Sokolová SJ, Forýtková L, Holoubková Z.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Subjective determination of ocular refraction. I: Optical principles].
    Friedburg D, Krause K.
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Jul; 99(7):586-93; quiz 594-7. PubMed ID: 12148309
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Principles of modern determination of refraction].
    Krause K.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 May; 194(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 2664321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Influence of hypobaric environmental and working conditions on the ocular dioptric apparatus].
    Popescu MP, Stefan M, Cincă N, Pintilie I, Stoian M.
    Fiziol Norm Patol; 1965 May; 11(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 5865217
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The subordination of refraction.
    Goss DA, Penisten DK.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):580-2. PubMed ID: 8942129
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Experiences with the automatic refractor "Dioptron" (author's transl)].
    Rassow B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Sep; 167(3):474-5. PubMed ID: 1214428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of pinhole visual acuity at an urban Indian hospital.
    Kumar RS, Rackenchath MV, Sathidevi AV, Nagaraj S, Moe CA, Stamper RL, Keenan JD.
    Eye (Lond); 2019 Feb; 33(2):335-337. PubMed ID: 30341426
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.