These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
101 related items for PubMed ID: 531479
1. Comparison of ascending and bracketing methods in pure tone audiometry. A multi-laboratory study. Arlinger SD. Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 531479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. Jerlvall L, Arlinger S. Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 3704542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High frequency audiometry in facial paralysis. Rahko T, Karma P. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 449():161-3. PubMed ID: 3201943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring. Rieke CC, Clavier OH, Allen LV, Anderson AP, Brooks CA, Fellows AM, Brungart DS, Buckey JC. Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening. Baldwin M, Watkin P. Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children. Rahko-Laitila P, Karma P, Laippala P, Salmelin R, Sipilä M, Manninen M, Rahko T. Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Lin YH, Chen PR, Hsu CJ, Wu HP. J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Beahan N, Kei J, Driscoll C, Charles B, Khan A. Ear Hear; 2012 Jan; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Audiometric zero for air conduction using manual audiometry. Fearn RW, Hanson DR. Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 6626786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry. Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. Audiology; 1979 May; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship of pulsed, continuous, and warble extended-high frequency thresholds. Hamill TA, Haas WH. J Commun Disord; 1986 Jun; 19(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 3722436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss. Ahn JH, Lee HS, Kim YJ, Yoon TH, Chung JW. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry. Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC. Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characteristics and significance of 1/2 octave frequency pure-tone audiometry on 82 patients with tinnitus]. Chen P, Su J, Cai H, Zheng M, Huang D. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 18(10):593-5. PubMed ID: 15620135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects]. Liu H, Zhu GY, Yang XP, Zhou XR, Wan L, Fan LH. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]