These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


133 related items for PubMed ID: 5438577

  • 1. Preparation for femoropopliteal bypass. A new method to utilize the small saphenous vein.
    Turcotte JG, Dent TL, Fry WJ.
    Arch Surg; 1970 May; 100(5):627-9. PubMed ID: 5438577
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hemorrhage and thrombosis as early complications of femoropopliteal bypass grafts: causes, treatment, and prognostic implications.
    Craver JM, Ottinger LW, Darling RC, Austen WG, Linton RR.
    Surgery; 1973 Dec; 74(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 4749628
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparisons of three technics for femoral-popliteal arterial reconstruction, 1. vein bypass, 2. open endarterectomy, 3. semiclosed endarterectomy.
    Imparato AM, Bracco A, Kim GE.
    Ann Surg; 1973 Mar; 177(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 4692120
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Late failure of arterialized in situ saphenous vein.
    Barner HB, Judd DR, Kaiser GC, Willman VL, Hanlon CR.
    Arch Surg; 1969 Dec; 99(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 5370203
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Femoral-tibial bypass grafting.
    Kaminski DL, Barner HB, Dorighi JA, Kaiser GC, Willman VL.
    Arch Surg; 1972 Apr; 104(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 5013792
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The cephalic vein as a peripheral vascular graft.
    Kakkar VV.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Mar; 128(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 5777545
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessment of reconstructive procedures for femoropopliteal artery occlusive disease.
    Downs AR.
    Am Heart J; 1971 May; 81(5):716-7. PubMed ID: 5552074
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Femoropopliteal composite dacron and autogenous vein bypass grafts. A preliminary report.
    Linton RR, Wirthlin LS.
    Arch Surg; 1973 Nov; 107(5):748-53. PubMed ID: 4270358
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Stage II obliterating arteriopathy of the lower limbs. The problem of indications of reconstructive arterial surgery in patients with intermittent claudication].
    Deriu GP, Ballotta E, Maruotti R.
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1978 Nov; 26(11):743-5. PubMed ID: 724122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of autogenous vein bypass grafts with vein patch angioplasty.
    Baddeley RM.
    Proc R Soc Med; 1968 Mar; 61(3):215. PubMed ID: 5645950
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of saphenous vein homografts for arterial reconstruction: a preliminary report.
    Tice DA, Santoni E.
    Surgery; 1970 Mar; 67(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 5413449
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.