These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


89 related items for PubMed ID: 5464976

  • 21. Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. II. Interaction of electrical polarization and acoustic stimulation.
    Teas DC, Konishi T, Wernick JS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Jun; 47(6):1527-37. PubMed ID: 5426305
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Evoked potentials in the human auditory system].
    Khechinashvili SN, Kevanishvili ZSh, Kadzhaia OA.
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1972 Apr; 58(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 5027248
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of in vivo perfusion of glutamate dehydrogenase in the guinea pig cochlea on the VIIIth nerve compound action potential.
    Rebillard G, Bryant GM.
    Brain Res; 1989 Aug 14; 494(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 2776022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Appendix 2: relationship between the compound PST histogram and the neural activity arising from distinct locations in the cochlea.
    Elberling C, Bappert E, Hieke D, Hoke M.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Aug 14; (9):161-6. PubMed ID: 294679
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The mechanism of excitation of the hair cells in the cochlea.
    Honrubia V, Strelioff D, Ward PH.
    Laryngoscope; 1971 Oct 14; 81(10):1719-25. PubMed ID: 5114167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Frequency selective masking in electrocochleography.
    Eggermont JJ, Odenthal DW.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974 Oct 14; 95(7-8):489-96. PubMed ID: 4460142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Intracellular electric responses to sound in a vertebrate cochlea.
    Mulroy MJ, Altmann DW, Weiss TF, Peake WT.
    Nature; 1974 May 31; 249(456):482-5. PubMed ID: 4834237
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A new method for stimulus generation and signal detection in electrocochleography.
    Bally GV, Hoke M.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974 May 31; 95(7-8):502-7. PubMed ID: 4460143
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Placement of electrodes for excitation of the eighth nerve.
    Walloch RA, Cowden DA.
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Jul 31; 100(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 4842610
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Anatomy and physiology of the onset of auditory function.
    Pujol R, Hilding D.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Jul 31; 76(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 4753113
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Animal experiment studies of the readaptation behavior of acoustic organ].
    Theissing J, Fraas G.
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1968 Jan 31; 47(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 5670260
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The origin of the waveform of cochlear whole action potential.
    Boelen HJ.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979 Jan 31; 222(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 444154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Electrophysiological results in reduced ototoxicity of basic Streptomyces antibiotics].
    Stange G, Soda T, Beck C.
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1967 Jan 31; 188(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 5599746
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The auditory system in humans.
    Doyle JH.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Mar 31; 76(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9086641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Experimental study of drug ototoxicity by an electrocochleographic method. Preliminary results with kanamycin in the rat].
    Bessard G, Accoyer B, Moreno-Ribes V, Gavend M, Charachon R.
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1975 Oct 31; 24(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 129514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Electric responses of cat's cochlea under the effect of streptomycin].
    Shvedov VV.
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1978 Oct 31; (2):30-3. PubMed ID: 654546
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Dependence of rapid hearing adaptation on the interstimulus time interval and on the intensity of acoustic signals].
    Bazarov VG, Chaĭka SP, Moroz BS, Chudnovskiĭ SI, Poliakov AN.
    Fiziol Zh (1978); 1987 Oct 31; 33(2):19-24. PubMed ID: 3582682
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A method for determining the driving currents for focused stimulation in the cochlea.
    Rodenhiser KL, Spelman FA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Apr 31; 42(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 7729833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Interpretation of the whole-nerve action potential off-effect in response to tone bursts.
    Grandori F.
    Audiology; 1979 Apr 31; 18(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 373733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Evaluation of the interrelations among auditory potential parameters by means of the technic of correlation-regression analysis].
    Davidenko IP, Zaiats TA, Burik MV, Chaĭka SP, Petrenko TIu.
    Neirofiziologiia; 1982 Apr 31; 14(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 6287314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.