These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 5595616

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Practical evaluation of exposure doses in the patient and in radiological personnel in radiologic diagnosis, using thermoluminescence dosimetry].
    Busuoli G, Cavallini A, Pastremoli A.
    Radiobiol Radioter Fis Med; 1968; 23(6):427-40. PubMed ID: 5747128
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Reduction of patient exposure from diagnostic radiology by body positioning.
    Wagner W, Buchignani JS, Howley JR.
    Health Phys; 1972 Apr; 22(4):398-9. PubMed ID: 5045203
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Quotient of energy flux-ion dose as characteristics of x-ray irradiation].
    Drexler G, Gossrau M, Nahrstedt U.
    Strahlentherapie; 1970 Jan; 139(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 5522377
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Radiation protection for radiologic technologists.
    Newman J.
    Radiol Technol; 2000 Jan; 71(3):273-86; quiz 267, 287-9. PubMed ID: 10665051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Radiation protection of the patients in radiodiagnostics. Choice of dosimeters].
    Boulenger R.
    J Belge Radiol; 1971 Jan; 54(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 5145144
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Patient exposure to x-rays now reduced 8 times (for radiography)].
    Nouv Presse Med; 1974 Jun 15; 3(24):1574. PubMed ID: 4849363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Radiation dose to technicians for nuclear medicine procedures.
    Harding LK, Thomson WH, Clarke EA.
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Apr 15; 25(4):444. PubMed ID: 9643972
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A protocol for exposure limitation in radiography.
    Bednarek DR, Rozenfeld M, Lanzl LH, Sabau M.
    Radiol Technol; 1981 Apr 15; 53(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 7345472
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Control of x-radiation in dentistry. Canadian Dental Association.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Dec 15; 65(11):610-1. PubMed ID: 10658389
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [THE COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF IRON AND ALUMINUM FILTERS IN RADIOGRAPHY].
    KOCZKAS G, BOJTOR I, SARMAI E.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1964 Dec 15; 101():661-4. PubMed ID: 14335867
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [The exposure to x-rays of patients and radiological personnel by heart soundings as well as contrast media display of the heart and the great blood vessels. I. Introduction--methods--measurements on a device for image intensifier-television x-ray screening and image intensifier-cinematography].
    Schulte-Brinkmann W.
    Strahlentherapie; 1966 Jan 15; 129(1):139-55. PubMed ID: 5983025
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Using technique factors to predict patient ESE.
    Warner R.
    Radiol Technol; 1993 Jan 15; 65(1):21-6; quiz 27-9. PubMed ID: 8234657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.