These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 5742086

  • 1. Mass cervical cancer screening program by irrigation smear in Japan.
    Kawashima Y, Ino S, Tashiro K, Tachibana M, Masukawa T.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Jul; 32(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 5742086
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Klinken L, Koch F, Albrechtsen R.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cytology screening--a program that works.
    MacLean MA.
    Can Nurse; 1969 May; 65(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 5769363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Sato S, Mikino H, Matsunaga G, Yajima A.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 May; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Vaginal-cytological examination. Routine examination of a symptom-free young clientele].
    Hastrup J, Rojel K.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1968 Feb 08; 130(6):243-5. PubMed ID: 5676294
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix.
    Anderson WA, Gunn SA.
    Acta Cytol; 1966 Feb 08; 10(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 5227363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA, Fogh H, Moller PE, Strandbygard K.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun 08; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Appraisal of self-collected cervical specimens in cytologic screening of uterine cancer.
    Arata T, Sekiba K, Kato K.
    Acta Cytol; 1978 Jun 08; 22(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 277040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A, Phillips N, Kan L, Matisic J, Benedet L, Towers L.
    J Med Screen; 2005 Jun 08; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.