These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

241 related items for PubMed ID: 5746292

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Colposcopy and the conservative management of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.
    Chanen W, Hollyock VE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Apr; 43(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 4817004
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Significance of dysplasia.
    Koss LG.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Dec; 13(4):873-88. PubMed ID: 4930556
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Klinken L, Koch F, Albrechtsen R.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Epithelial abnormalities of the ectocervix during pregnancy; an invitational symposium.
    J Reprod Med; 1970 Jan; 4(1):13-26 passim. PubMed ID: 5520231
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cytologic, vascular, and histologic patterns of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and early invasive carcinoma of the cervix.
    Johannisson E, Kolstad P, Söderberg G.
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1966 Jan; ():Suppl 258:1+. PubMed ID: 5964746
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sharp conization of the cervix. Observations of 501 consecutive patients.
    McCann SW, Mickal A, Crapanzano JT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Apr; 33(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 5776102
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Premalignant lesions. Various aspects of the cervix uteri dysplasia].
    Nava y Sánchez RM, López Ortiz E, Ruiz Velasco V.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1973 Nov; 34(205):515-33. PubMed ID: 4768891
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Practical colposcopy in early cervical and vaginal cancer.
    Bolten KA.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Dec; 10(4):808-37. PubMed ID: 4871716
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical consequences in patients with suspect cell findings on initial vaginal cytology.
    Berget A, Gyldensted M, Skaarup P, Szczepanski K.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):131-7. PubMed ID: 5041570
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Frozen section evaluation of the cervical conization specimen.
    Kaufman RH.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Dec; 10(4):838-52. PubMed ID: 4172734
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.