These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The source along the basilar membrane of the cochlear microphonic potential recorded by surface electrodes in man. Sohmer H, Kinarti R, Gafni M. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Sep; 49(5-6):506-14. PubMed ID: 6158432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cochlear microphonic potentials with surface electrodes in the diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss]. De los Santos G, Sanjuán J, Gavilán J. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Sep; 50(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 10491471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study of the mechanism of auditory adaptation by simultaneous recording of cortical auditory evoked potentials and cochlear microphonic potentials]. Sagalovich BM, Melkumova GG. Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 May; 91(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 7260374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prolongation of the cochlear microphonic in man. Cochlear microphonic ringing. Gibbin KP, Mason SM, Kent SE. Acta Otolaryngol; 1983 May; 95(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 6829293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects. Zhang M. Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Far-field cochlear microphonic responses to continuous pure tones recorded from the scalps of cats. Schwent VL, Jewett DL. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 6153961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measures of cochlear travelling wave delay in humans: I. Comparison of three techniques in subjects with normal hearing. Serbetçioğlu MB, Parker DJ. Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 May; 119(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 10478592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface-recorded cochlear microphonic potentials during temporary threshold shifts in man. Pratt H, Sohmer H, Barazani N. Audiology; 1978 May; 17(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 666656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in cochlear microphonic sensitivity after priming C57BL/6j mice at various ages for audiogenic seizures. Saunders JC, Hirsch KA. J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1976 Feb; 90(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 1249273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Campbell L, Bester C, Iseli C, Sly D, Dragovic A, Gummer AW, O'Leary S. Audiol Neurootol; 2017 Feb; 22(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 29084395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method. Yoshie N, Yamaura K. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1969 Feb; 252():37-69. PubMed ID: 5267211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory neuropathy in systemic sclerosis: a speech perception and evoked potential study before and after cochlear implantation. Santarelli R, Scimemi P, Dal Monte E, Genovese E, Arslan E. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 263(9):809-15. PubMed ID: 16763823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]