These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


117 related items for PubMed ID: 5954653

  • 21. Perceived depth between familiar objects.
    Gogel WC, Mertens HW.
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 5655111
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Effect of light intensity on binocular distance perception].
    Heller J, Reyersbach R.
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 42(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 7497071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Relative distance judgments of familiar and unfamiliar objects viewed under representatively natural conditions.
    Predebon J.
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2345687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Moving shadows contribute to the corridor illusion in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Imura T, Tomonaga M.
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19685969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Matching boxes: familiar size influences action programming.
    McIntosh RD, Lashley G.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(9):2441-4. PubMed ID: 18407302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.
    BAIRD JC.
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.
    Swanston MT, Gogel WC.
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 May; 39(5):309-26. PubMed ID: 3737362
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Range estimation of familiar targets presented against a black background. NASA TN D-2845.
    Beasley GP, Pennington JE.
    Tech Note U S Natl Aeronaut Space Adm; 1965 Nov; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 5317759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Problems with picture perception: a reply to Rosinski.
    Hagen MA.
    Psychol Bull; 1976 Nov; 83(6):1176-8. PubMed ID: 996214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. EFFECTIVE DIFFERENCE IN INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE.
    EPSTEIN W.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():383-4. PubMed ID: 14166025
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. SIZE CONSTANCY: FUNCTIONAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE IN VISUAL PERCEPTION.
    TAYAL OP.
    J Gen Psychol; 1964 Jan; 70():121-37. PubMed ID: 14115826
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.