These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

75 related items for PubMed ID: 5954728

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. On estimating relative potency from quadratic log-dose response relationships.
    Cox CP.
    Biometrics; 1972 Sep; 28(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 5073257
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Approximate tests of independence in contingency tables from complex stratified cluster samples.
    Nathan G.
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1973 Mar; (53):1-14. PubMed ID: 4540945
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Some mathematical remarks on the problem of standardization of cardiac glycosides].
    Schneider B.
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1967 Oct; 17(10):1242-3. PubMed ID: 5632868
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The asymptotic efficiency of tests using misclassified data in contingency tables.
    Korn EL.
    Biometrics; 1982 Jun; 38(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 6981434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Computerized devices for biological testing].
    Zakharov IS, Paputskaia NI, Pozharov AV, Lepiakhov AIu.
    Med Tekh; 1995 Jun; (1):32-6. PubMed ID: 7783588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bioimmunoassay of gonadotrophins. I. Theoretical considerations.
    Petrusz P, Diczfalusy E, Finney DJ.
    Acta Endocrinol (Copenh); 1971 May; 67(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 5108346
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A computer program for testing average partial association in three-way contingency tables (PARCAT).
    Landis JR, Cooper MM, Kennedy T, Koch GG.
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 May; 9(3):223-46. PubMed ID: 436406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Some chi 2-tests for testing hypotheses in contingency tables].
    Jesdinsky HJ.
    Methods Inf Med; 1968 Jul; 7(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 5711236
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer generated track scoring tables.
    Gardner JB, Purdy JG.
    Med Sci Sports; 1970 Jul; 2(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 5527258
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Classification of multidimensional contingency tables].
    Victor N.
    Biometrics; 1972 Jun; 28(2):427-41. PubMed ID: 5037864
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Statistical evaluation of mathematical models for microbial growth.
    López S, Prieto M, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, France J.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Nov 15; 96(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 15454319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mathematical modelling in neuroendocrinology.
    Leng G, Macgregor DJ.
    J Neuroendocrinol; 2008 Jun 15; 20(6):713-8. PubMed ID: 18513205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computation of the quasi-independence model for the analysis of triangular contingency tables.
    Aktaş S.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan 15; 89(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 18037188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.