These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


111 related items for PubMed ID: 5963123

  • 1. Color coding and potency of anchors and residuals in judgment of size.
    Bevan W, Avant LL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Jun; 22(3):919-26. PubMed ID: 5963123
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. On the role of context effects in psychophysical judgment.
    Anderson NH.
    Psychol Rev; 1975 Nov; 82(6):462-82. PubMed ID: 1187911
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. SIZE-WEIGHT ILLUSION AND ANCHORING OF WEIGHT JUDGMENTS.
    FREEMAN I, ADAM J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():63-8. PubMed ID: 14286558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. EFFECTS OF ANCHORING ON WEIGHT JUDGMENTS OF NORMALS AND SCHIZOPHRENICS.
    WURSTER SA.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Mar; 1():274-8. PubMed ID: 14328734
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Effect of various comparison methods and various arrangements of material on the size-weight-effect in the demonstration of the Koseleff illusion].
    Schüle W.
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1978 Mar; 25(3):500-11. PubMed ID: 716499
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. CONSTANT ERRORS IN WEIGHT JUDGEMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF THE SIZE OF THE DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD.
    ROSS HE.
    Br J Psychol; 1964 May; 55():133-41. PubMed ID: 14168478
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of cross-continuum anchors.
    Aftanas MS, Rule SJ.
    Am J Psychol; 1968 Dec; 81(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 5760036
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHTNESS UPON THE JUDGEMENT OF SIZE.
    BEVAN W, TURNER ED.
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():90-5. PubMed ID: 14270433
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationships among oral form recognition, interdental thickness discrimination and interdental weight discrimination.
    Williams WN, La Pointe LL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):191-4. PubMed ID: 5054038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Length, weight, and width: covariation assessments based on haptic exploration.
    McGahan JR, Williamson JD, Stoecker J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1459-68. PubMed ID: 9700826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Apparent weight differences as a source of after-effects.
    Kolehmainen K, Mikkonen VV.
    Scand J Psychol; 1970 Jun; 11(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 5525911
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Potency and evaluation qualities as a condition of perceptive size accentuation].
    Ertel S, Stubbe D.
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1968 Jun; 15(1):49-69. PubMed ID: 5712606
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups.
    Chong SC, Treisman A.
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):891-900. PubMed ID: 15644229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Developmental study of similarity judgments involving dimensions.
    Fahrmeier ED, Medin DL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Oct; 45(2):619-29. PubMed ID: 917719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.