These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


275 related items for PubMed ID: 6068495

  • 1. Obstetric forceps of vacuum extractor?
    Br Med J; 1967 Sep 23; 3(5568):753. PubMed ID: 6068495
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Our experience in the use of forceps and vacuum extractor].
    Avezzú G, Giannone R.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1973 Jan 23; 25(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 4696914
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Use of the vacuum extractor and of the forceps in our service during the last 4 years].
    Boudjemaa S, Ben Cheikh TB, Haddad M.
    Tunis Med; 1973 Jan 23; 51(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 4783607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [INDICATIONS FOR SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS WHEN FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTOR ARE AVAILABLE].
    DOEMOETOERI J, CSOEMOER S, TREIT S.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1965 Mar 06; 87():332-7. PubMed ID: 14288865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Obstetrical vacuum extraction and forceps. Comparative study between two series of 100 cases].
    Teppa PA.
    Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1967 Mar 06; 27(3):547-60. PubMed ID: 5609904
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Mechanical action of obstetrical forceps on the fetal skull].
    Issel EP.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977 Mar 06; 99(8):487-97. PubMed ID: 878727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. THE VACUUM-EXTRACTOR. II. VALUE IN RELATION TO FORCEPS AND RANGE OF INDICATIONS.
    Lang P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964 Mar 06; 43(S1):57-85. PubMed ID: 14150609
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Operative obstetrics--section, vacuum, forceps. Clinical results in 3,742 cases 1966 to 1980].
    Hohlweg-Majert P, Rüdenauer R, Seifert R, Stoll P.
    Fortschr Med; 1985 May 02; 103(17):450-2. PubMed ID: 3997028
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb 02; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul 02; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [VACUUM DELIVERY AND FORCEPS OPERATION].
    MITANI S, NAKAJIMA T.
    Sanfujinka Chiryo; 1963 Aug 02; 7():196-204. PubMed ID: 14046879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Clinical evaluation of the usefulness of vacuum extractor].
    Kietlińska Z, Podsiadlowska W, Stelmachów J.
    Wiad Lek; 1969 Nov 15; 22(22):2033-9. PubMed ID: 5367273
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The obstetric vacuum extractor is the instrument of first choice for operative vaginal delivery.
    Chalmers JA, Chalmers I.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May 15; 96(5):505-6. PubMed ID: 2757977
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M, Ahinko-Hakamaa K, Laakkonen E, Kivelä P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct 15; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Studies and comparisons of the degree of fetal distress after the use of the vacuum extractor and forceps].
    Cappello F.
    Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1968 Oct 15; 73(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 5742959
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Letter: Barton's forceps.
    Lee M.
    Med J Aust; 1975 Feb 08; 1(6):182. PubMed ID: 1128392
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S, Glezerman M, Baider C, Sadan O.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr 08; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative study of delivery by vacuum extractor and forceps.
    Schenker JG, Serr DM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1967 May 01; 98(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 6023493
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The use of the vacuum extractor: a reappraisal.
    Matheson GW, Davajan V, Mishell DR.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1968 May 01; 47(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 5709214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vacuum extraction or forceps?
    Chalmers JA.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb 01; 292(6516):343-4. PubMed ID: 3080165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.