These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

104 related items for PubMed ID: 6174596

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of a new centrifugal air sampler (RCS) with a slit air sampler (SAS) in a hospital environment.
    Nakhla LS, Cummings RF.
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Sep; 2(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 6174596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
    Casewell MW, Fermie PG, Thomas C, Simmons NA.
    J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The performance of the Biotest RCS centrifugal air sampler.
    Clark S, Lach V, Lidwell OM.
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Jun; 2(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6174582
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Casella Slit Sampler or the Biotest Centrifugal Sampler--which is the more efficient?
    Whyte W.
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Dec; 2(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 6175686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B.
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994 Dec; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of airborne operating room bacteria with a Biap slit sampler.
    Tjade OH, Gabor I.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Feb; 84(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 6985926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of bacterial recovery by Reuter centrifugal air sampler and slit-to-agar sampler.
    Placencia AM, Peeler JT, Oxborrow GS, Danielson JW.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 44(2):512-3. PubMed ID: 6751234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Some aspects on the use of the Biotest RCS Air Sampler in unidirectional air flow testing.
    Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B.
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1991 Aug; 45(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1770410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M, Miyamae T.
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR, Mainelis G, Yao M.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficiency of "Biotest RCS" as a sampler of airborne bacteria.
    Kaye S.
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1988 Dec; 42(5):147-52. PubMed ID: 3199265
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Air sampling of pigs infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus: comparison of Litton and cyclone samplers.
    Donaldson AI, Ferris NP, Gloster J.
    Res Vet Sci; 1982 Nov; 33(3):384-5. PubMed ID: 6296955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.