These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 6202752

  • 1. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
    Casewell MW, Fermie PG, Thomas C, Simmons NA.
    J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The use of the Reuter centrifugal air sampler for the estimation of bacterial air counts in different hospital locations.
    Casewell MW, Desai N, Lease EJ.
    J Hosp Infect; 1986 May; 7(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 2873171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Air sampling in hospitals.
    Gröschel DH.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980 May; 353():230-40. PubMed ID: 6939388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparative evaluation of a new centrifugal air sampler (RCS) with a slit air sampler (SAS) in a hospital environment.
    Nakhla LS, Cummings RF.
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Sep; 2(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 6174596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR, Mainelis G, Yao M.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B.
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994 Dec; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Collection of bacterial aerosols by means of slit-sampler: a face-mask study.
    Melvaer KL, Ringstad H.
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Oct; 94(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 3788572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
    Kang YJ, Frank JF.
    J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Casella Slit Sampler or the Biotest Centrifugal Sampler--which is the more efficient?
    Whyte W.
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Dec; 2(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 6175686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sterilization efficacy of ultraviolet irradiation on microbial aerosols under dynamic airflow by experimental air conditioning systems.
    Nakamura H.
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1987 Jun; 34(2):25-40. PubMed ID: 3127068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved large-volume sampler for the collection of bacterial cells from aerosol.
    White LA, Hadley DJ, Davids DE, Naylor R.
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Mar; 29(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 803820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M, Miyamae T.
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of bacterial recovery by Reuter centrifugal air sampler and slit-to-agar sampler.
    Placencia AM, Peeler JT, Oxborrow GS, Danielson JW.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 44(2):512-3. PubMed ID: 6751234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A monitor for airborne bacteria.
    ANDERSEN AA, ANDERSEN MR.
    Appl Microbiol; 1962 May; 10(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 13861149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
    Kang YJ, Frank JF.
    J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Novel multi-slit large-volume air sampler.
    Buchanan LM, Decker HM, Frisque DE, Phillips CR, Dahlgren CM.
    Appl Microbiol; 1968 Aug; 16(8):1120-3. PubMed ID: 4970892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Enumeration of air-borne bacteria in hospital.
    WARNER P, GLASSCO A.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1963 Jun 29; 88(26):1280-3. PubMed ID: 13998956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media.
    Smid T, Schokkin E, Boleij JS, Heederik D.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May 29; 50(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 2729098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of airborne operating room bacteria with a Biap slit sampler.
    Tjade OH, Gabor I.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Feb 29; 84(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 6985926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts.
    Lundholm IM.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Jul 29; 44(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 6751223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.