These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

364 related items for PubMed ID: 622222

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Changing primary cesarean section patterns at a private hospital.
    Farb HF.
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Dec; 25(6):298-303. PubMed ID: 7205796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.
    Baskett TF, McMillen RM.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct 01; 125(7):723-6. PubMed ID: 7326654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. High cesarean section rate: a new perspective.
    Porreco RP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar 01; 65(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 4038791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J, van der Does CD.
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995 Mar 01; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN, Saywell RM, Zollinger TW, Erner BK, Oser TL.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct 01; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.
    Hughey MJ, LaPata RE, McElin TW, Lussky R.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May 01; 49(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 850561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
    Anderson GM, Lomas J.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb 01; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Cesarean section: science or anxiety? Eleven years of institutional experience].
    García-Benítes CQ, Lira Plascencia J, Ibargüengoitia Ochoa F, Aguayo González P, Ahued Ahued JR, Neri Méndez CJ.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Jun 01; 65():247-53. PubMed ID: 9273336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Toussaint S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb 01; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR, Burrows RF.
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr 15; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.