These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure. Cameron AE, Parker CJ, Field ES, Gray RC, Wyatt AP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 May; 69(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 3111339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure. Rappaport W, Allen R, Chvapil M, Benson D, Putnam C. Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs. Steen S, Andersson L, Löwenhielm P, Stridbeck H, Walther B, Holmin T. Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Ray JA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Growth of the aortic anastomosis in puppies--comparison of monofilament suture materials, whether absorbable or nonabsorbable, and of suture techniques, whether continuous or interrupted]. Nakashima S, Sugimoto H, Inoue M, Karashima S, Onitsuka T, Koga Y. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Feb; 92(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 1903833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]