These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 6351119

  • 1. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A critical review.
    Wolf SL.
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1448-59. PubMed ID: 6351119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.
    Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA.
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1393-403. PubMed ID: 6611660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status.
    Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA.
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1404-13. PubMed ID: 6611661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke.
    Bradley L, Hart BB, Mandana S, Flowers K, Riches M, Sanderson P.
    Clin Rehabil; 1998 Feb; 12(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 9549021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. EMG biofeedback in stroke: effect of patient characteristics.
    Wolf SL, Baker MP, Kelly JL.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1979 Mar; 60(3):96-102. PubMed ID: 485806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. EMG biofeedback in stroke: a 1-year follow-up on the effect of patient characteristics.
    Wolf SL, Baker MP, Kelly JL.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Aug; 61(8):351-5. PubMed ID: 7406672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial.
    Burnside IG, Tobias HS, Bursill D.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 May; 63(5):217-22. PubMed ID: 7041850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of EMG biofeedback on postoperative pain following abdominal surgery.
    Madden C, Singer G, Peck C, Nayman J.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1978 Nov; 6(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 153716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electromyographic biofeedback for treatment of tinnitus.
    Borton TE, Clark SR.
    Am J Otol; 1988 Jan; 9(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3364533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis.
    Moreland J, Thomson MA.
    Phys Ther; 1994 Jun; 74(6):534-43; discussion 544-7. PubMed ID: 8197240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Experimental foundations of EMG biofeedback with the upper extremity: a review of the literature.
    Ince LP, Leon MS, Christidis D.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1984 Sep; 9(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 6525360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of the hemiplegic hand: a placebo-controlled study.
    Armagan O, Tascioglu F, Oner C.
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 82(11):856-61. PubMed ID: 14566153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.