These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

95 related items for PubMed ID: 6364748

  • 21. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ, Winfield AC, Muhletaler CA, Kirchner FK.
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral).
    Skalpe IO, Anke IM.
    Neuroradiology; 1983 Sep; 25(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 6350922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Contrast media in double-contrast arthrography of the knee: a comparison of ioxaglate and iothalamate preparations.
    Ingram C, Stoker DJ.
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 59(698):143-6. PubMed ID: 3512006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A clinical trial of a new low osmolality contrast medium. Sodium and meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) compared with meglumine iothalamate (Conray) for carotid arteriography.
    Grainger RG.
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Oct; 52(622):781-6. PubMed ID: 389336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
    Hagen B, Wenzel-Hora BI.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Oct; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Renal angiography with iohexol and metrizoate.
    Törnquist C, Holtås S.
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):331-4. PubMed ID: 6691084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Kieffer SA.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Feb; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in cerebral angiography.
    Norman D, Brant-Zawadzki M, Sobel D.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Feb; 19(6 Suppl):S306-7. PubMed ID: 6392158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Iohexol versus metrizamide for lumbar myelography: double-blind trial.
    Gabrielsen TO, Gebarski SS, Knake JE, Latack JT, Yang PJ, Hoff JT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 May; 142(5):1047-9. PubMed ID: 6372410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Pain in peripheral arteriography-a comparison of a low osmolality contrast medium with a conventional compound.
    Tillmann U, Adler R, Fuchs WA.
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Feb; 52(614):102-4. PubMed ID: 371733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.