These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 6368460

  • 61. Contrast media nephropathy: intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized trial.
    Lufft V, Hoogestraat-Lufft L, Fels LM, Egbeyong-Baiyee D, Tusch G, Galanski M, Olbricht CJ.
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Aug; 40(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 12148095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. Intravenous angiography using digital video subtraction: intravenous cervicocerebrovascular angiography.
    Christenson PC, Ovitt TW, Fisher HD, Frost MM, Nudelman S, Roehrig H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Dec; 135(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 6779518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Incidence of fibrillation with dilute contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW, Ventura J.
    Invest Radiol; 1986 May; 21(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 3519525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Optimal iodine concentration in digital subtraction arteriography.
    Norman D, Brant-Zawadzki M, Gould RG, Newton TH.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 May; 19(6 Suppl):S368-70. PubMed ID: 6392167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. Carbon dioxide contrast agent for CT arteriography: results in a porcine model.
    Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Mommertz G, Mühlenbruch G, Jacobs MJ, Günther RW, Langer S.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):1055-64. PubMed ID: 18589320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. [Experimental and clinical determination of renal size after intravenous and intra-arterial administration of ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Helzel MV, Wolf GK, Prager P.
    Rofo; 1985 Mar; 142(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 2984739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Intravenous angiography using digital video subtraction: x-ray imaging system.
    Ovitt TW, Christenson PC, Fisher HD, Frost MM, Nudelman S, Roehrig H, Seeley G.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Dec; 135(6):1141-4. PubMed ID: 6779517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the detection of spinal angiomas].
    Becker H, Vogelsang H.
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):686-9. PubMed ID: 6429785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. Complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Ball JB, Lukin RR, Tomsick TA, Chambers AA.
    Arch Neurol; 1985 Oct; 42(10):969-72. PubMed ID: 3899062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. [Evaluation of renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
    Hori S, Narumi Y, Marukawa T, Tanaka T, Tokunaga K, Yoshioka H, Kuroda C, Ichikawa S, Ishibashi M, Takaha M.
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1329-37. PubMed ID: 3909790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.