These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


166 related items for PubMed ID: 6375599

  • 1. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Hasselgren PO, Ivarsson L, Risberg B, Seeman T.
    Ann Surg; 1984 Jul; 200(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 6375599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Infections and antibiotic prophylaxis in reconstructive vascular surgery.
    Herbst A, Kamme C, Norgren L, Qvarfordt P, Ribbe E, Thörne J.
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 3(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 2767253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis.
    Geroulanos S, Oxelbark S, Turina M.
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1986 Aug; 27(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 3514630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cardiovascular surgery prophylaxis. A randomized, controlled comparison of cefazolin and cefuroxime.
    Doebbeling BN, Pfaller MA, Kuhns KR, Massanari RM, Behrendt DM, Wenzel RP.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Jun; 99(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 2193200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [A prospective, randomized comparative study between cefazolin and cefuroxime as perioperative antibiotic prevention in cardiovascular surgery].
    Geroulanos S, Oxelbark S, Turina M.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1984 Mar 03; 114(9):297-303. PubMed ID: 6369532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Prospective randomized study: cefuroxime and netilmicin versus ceftriaxone as prophylaxis in vascular surgery].
    Muckenhuber P, Salem G.
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 1985 Mar 03; 87():27-8. PubMed ID: 3885582
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Randomized, prospective comparison of first- and second-generation cephalosporins as infection prophylaxis for cardiac surgery.
    Curtis JJ, Boley TM, Walls JT, Hamory B, Schmaltz RA.
    Am J Surg; 1993 Dec 03; 166(6):734-7. PubMed ID: 8273859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Controlled trial of cephradine versus cefuroxime in vascular surgery.
    Barlow IW, Ausobsky JR, Wilkinson D, Kester RC.
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 1989 Dec 03; 9(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 2663737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Infection prophylaxis in pulmonary surgery: a randomized prospective study.
    Tarkka M, Pokela R, Lepojärvi M, Nissinen J, Kärkölä P.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 Nov 03; 44(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 3675055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The prophylaxis of surgical wound infection: is cefuroxime any better than cephaloridine?
    Mayer AD, Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV.
    J Hosp Infect; 1982 Jun 03; 3(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 6181131
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.