These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 6375629

  • 1. Duplex ultrasonography, digital subtraction angiography, and conventional angiography in assessing carotid atherosclerosis.
    Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Jackson VP, Becker GJ, Dilley RS, Holden RW.
    Arch Surg; 1984 Jun; 119(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 6375629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intravenous DSA and duplex sonography as screening examinations for carotid disease: comparison in 102 vessels.
    Wolverson MK, Heiberg E, Tantana S, Pilla TJ.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1985 Jun; 6(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 3927673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of ultrasound scanning/Doppler with digital subtraction angiography in evaluating carotid arterial disease.
    Bendick PJ, Jackson VP, Becker GJ.
    Med Instrum; 1983 Jun; 17(3):220-2. PubMed ID: 6348498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of angiography, intravenous digital subtraction angiography and duplex ultrasound in the diagnosis of carotid artery atherosclerosis.
    D'Alotto C, Pelz DM, Rankin RN.
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Sep; 36(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 3900078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the carotid bifurcation by duplex ultrasound, intravenous and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Boné G, Ladurner G, Karas I, Grobovschek M, Punzengruber J.
    Eur Neurol; 1988 Sep; 28(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 3286270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Indications for intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular insufficiency. A new diagnostic concept including ultrasound.
    Neufang KF, Friedmann G.
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 May; 5(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 3888629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Digital subtraction angiography.
    Hesselink JR.
    Neurol Clin; 1984 Nov; 2(4):823-33. PubMed ID: 6394994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, conventional angiography, and duplex scanning.
    Riles TS, Eidelman EM, Litt AW, Pinto RS, Oldford F, Schwartzenberg GW.
    Stroke; 1992 Mar; 23(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 1542893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.