These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 6375633

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simple skin closure.
    Irvin TT.
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jun; 33(6):325-30. PubMed ID: 3893586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006 Jun; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skin wound closure. The effect of various wound closure methods on susceptibility to infection.
    Stillman RM, Bella FJ, Seligman SJ.
    Arch Surg; 1980 May; 115(5):674-5. PubMed ID: 6246851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Selection of wound closure materials.
    Bennett RG.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Apr; 18(4 Pt 1):619-37. PubMed ID: 3286691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Rodeheaver G.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012 Apr; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Scientific basis for selecting staple and tape skin closures.
    Edlich RF, Becker DG, Thacker JG, Rodeheaver GT.
    Clin Plast Surg; 1990 Jul; 17(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 2199146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC, Foresman PA, Bill TJ, Bentrem DJ, Rodeheaver GT, Edlich RF.
    J Appl Biomater; 1994 Jul; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Skin and fascia staple closure.
    Waldron DR.
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 1994 Mar; 24(2):413-23. PubMed ID: 8197678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
    Hlubek R, Walder P, Káňa J, Salounová D.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014 Mar; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Natural fiber reinforced biodegradable staples: Novel approach for efficient wound closure.
    Lalhmangaihzuali PC, Latha BD, More N, Choppadandi M, Kapusetti G.
    Med Hypotheses; 2019 May; 126():60-65. PubMed ID: 31010501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations.
    Angelini GD, Butchart EG, Armistead SH, Breckenridge IM.
    Thorax; 1984 Dec; 39(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 6096982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Staples or sutures for chest and leg wounds following cardiovascular surgery.
    Sanni A, Dunning J.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 6(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 17669827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The use of taped skin closure in orthopaedic wounds.
    Liew SM, Haw CS.
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1993 Feb; 63(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 8297301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative study of skin closure in hip surgery.
    Clayer M, Southwood RT.
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1991 May; 61(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 2025190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.