These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

201 related items for PubMed ID: 6378338

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD, Richardson AS, Waldman R.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD, Richardson AS, Waldman R.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD, Richardson AS, Waldman R.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S, Gilpatrick RO, Moore D.
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HB, Borgmeijer PJ, Gruythuysen RJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993 Oct; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M, Trisi P, Montanari G, Piattelli A.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A, Wilkie R, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R, Lidums A, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA, Hollander WR.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993 Aug; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth.
    Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Gale EN, Norman RD, Phillips RW.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980 Aug; 47(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 6934175
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ, Reukers EA.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Oct; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children.
    Oldenburg TR, Vann WF, Dilley DC.
    Dent Mater; 1987 Aug; 3(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 3481593
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.