These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


66 related items for PubMed ID: 6381618

  • 1. [Experimental anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. Comparative study between autograft and Al2O3 ceramic implantation].
    Taguchi T.
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Feb; 58(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 6381618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for anterior cervical interbody fusion in a caprine model.
    Toth JM, An HS, Lim TH, Ran Y, Weiss NG, Lundberg WR, Xu RM, Lynch KL.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Oct 15; 20(20):2203-10. PubMed ID: 8545713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vivo evaluation of anterior cervical fusions with hydroxylapatite graft material.
    Cook SD, Dalton JE, Tan EH, Tejeiro WV, Young MJ, Whitecloud TS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Aug 15; 19(16):1856-66. PubMed ID: 7973985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion. An experimental study using a synthetic tricalcium phosphate.
    Shima T, Keller JT, Alvira MM, Mayfield FH, Dunsker SB.
    J Neurosurg; 1979 Oct 15; 51(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 383911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of BMP-2 and combined IGF-I/TGF-ss1 application in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Knispel C, Hiller T, Schollmeier G, Bail H, Schmidmaier G, Duda G, Raschke M, Haas NP.
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct 15; 11(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 12384758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bioabsorbable interbody magnesium-polymer cage: degradation kinetics, biomechanical stiffness, and histological findings from an ovine cervical spine fusion model.
    Daentzer D, Willbold E, Kalla K, Bartsch I, Masalha W, Hallbaum M, Hurschler C, Kauth T, Kaltbeitzel D, Hopmann C, Welke B.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep 15; 39(20):E1220-7. PubMed ID: 25010099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-calcium phosphate ceramic composite for lumbar fusion in rhesus monkey interbody fusion model.
    Wang T, Dang G, Guo Z, Yang M.
    Tissue Eng; 2005 Sep 15; 11(7-8):1159-67. PubMed ID: 16144452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of hydroxylapatite graft materials in canine cervical spine fusions.
    Cook SD, Reynolds MC, Whitecloud TS, Routman AS, Harding AF, Kay JF, Jarcho M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 May 15; 11(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 3018946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparison of autograft, coralline graft, and xenograft in promoting posterior spinal fusion].
    Karaismailoğlu TN, Tomak Y, Andaç A, Ergün E.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2002 May 15; 36(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 12510097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.