These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


166 related items for PubMed ID: 6386857

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of antibody capture radio- and enzyme immunoassays with immunofluorescence for detecting IgM antibody in infants with congenital rubella.
    Chantler S, Evans CJ, Mortimer PP, Cradock-Watson JE, Ridehalgh MK.
    J Virol Methods; 1982 Aug; 4(6):305-13. PubMed ID: 6752160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fluoroimmunoassay for detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin M: comparison with indirect enzyme immunoassay and mu-chain capture.
    Echevarria JM, de Ory F, Najera R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 2995439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Problems in determining immune status in borderline specimens in an enzyme immunoassay for rubella immunoglobulin G antibody.
    Steece RS, Talley MS, Skeels MR, Lanier GA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):923-5. PubMed ID: 6381532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of a commercial antibody capture enzyme immunoassay for the detection of rubella specific IgM.
    Hodgson J, Morgan-Capner P.
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 May; 37(5):573-7. PubMed ID: 6725603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection of IgM antibodies against rubella virus: comparison of two indirect ELISAs and an anti-IgM capture immunoassay.
    Enders G, Knotek F.
    J Med Virol; 1986 Aug; 19(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 3528389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Detection of specific immunoglobulin M antibody to rubella virus by use of an enzyme-labeled antigen.
    Bonfanti C, Meurman O, Halonen P.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 21(6):963-8. PubMed ID: 3891775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of acute, recent, and previous rubella infection, vaccination, and congenital infections.
    Enders G, Knotek F, Pacher U.
    J Med Virol; 1985 Jul; 16(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 2993493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Kinetics of specific IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM antibody responses in rubella.
    Salonen EM, Hovi T, Meurman O, Vesikari T, Vaheri A.
    J Med Virol; 1985 May; 16(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3900285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies: comparison with sucrose density gradient centrifugation test.
    Meurman OH, Viljanen MK, Granfors K.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Mar; 5(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 856864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.