These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
245 related items for PubMed ID: 6389137
1. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media. Fraser AG, Culling W, Singh H, Ruttley MS, Newcombe RG. Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term hemodynamic effects of diatrizoate and ioxaglate contrast media in left ventriculography. Fast JH, Uyen GJ, Heystraten FM, de Boo TM, Lemmens WA. Int J Cardiol; 1985 May; 8(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3997289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. Svenson RH. Invest Radiol; 1984 May; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study. Folke K, Andrew E, Laulund S, Hansen PF. Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, Shabetai R, Higgins CB. Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography. Barth KH, Mertens MA. Invest Radiol; 1984 Apr; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76. Wolf GL. Invest Radiol; 1984 Apr; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Turski PA, Gentry LR, Matozzi F, Verma S. Invest Radiol; 1984 Apr; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects. Higgins CB, Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Shaw D. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Apr; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Reagan K, Bettman MA, Finkelstein J, Ganz P, Grassi CJ. Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical experience with ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in selective coronary arteriography. Corcos T, David PR, Bonan R, Paquet E, Lespérance J, Bourassa MG. J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 6526845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic effects of high versus low-osmolar contrast media for ventriculography in severe aortic stenosis. Lambert CR, Pepine CJ. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Dec; 11(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3130990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Coronary angiography in chronic and acute coronary artery disease. Advantages of a low osmolality contrast medium]. Zipfel J, Baller D, Blanke H, Karsch KR, Wolpers HG, Hellige G, Rentrop P. Z Kardiol; 1982 Sep; 71(9):576-80. PubMed ID: 7148075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]