These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


167 related items for PubMed ID: 6391782

  • 1. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography.
    de Vries AR, Engels PH, Overtoom TT, Saltzherr TP, Geyskes BG.
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(6):277-81. PubMed ID: 6391782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, Danti M, Fanelli F, Napoli A, Cavacece M, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography for noninvasive imaging of the renal artery.
    Zabbo A, Novick AC.
    Urol Clin North Am; 1984 Aug; 11(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 6235658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.
    Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, van Leeuwen MS, Smits HF, van der Ven PJ, Beutler JJ, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9314973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Kim D, Porter DH, Brown R, Crivello MS, Silva P, Leeming BW.
    Angiology; 1991 May; 42(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 2035886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Digital video subtraction angiography: screening technique for renovascular hypertension.
    Osborne RW, Goldstone J, Hillman BJ, Ovitt TW, Malone JM, Nudelman S.
    Surgery; 1981 Dec; 90(6):932-9. PubMed ID: 7031944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Transvenous digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in arterial hypertension. A comparison with conventional angiography].
    Schörner W, Kempter H, Banzer D, Aviles C, Weiss T, Felix R.
    Radiologe; 1984 Apr; 24(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 6374753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
    Clark RA, Alexander ES.
    Invest Radiol; 1983 Apr; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Wilms GE, Baert AL, Staessen JA, Amery AK.
    Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):713-5. PubMed ID: 3526406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of arterial complications after renal transplantation.
    Rath M, Castro L, Schuler M, Lissner J.
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 6373258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal arteries: intravenous digital subtraction angiography for follow-up.
    Schwarten DE.
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):369-73. PubMed ID: 6228954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fibromuscular dysplasia, a pitfall in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Busch HP, Strauss LG, Hoevels J, Georgi M.
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 6373260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis.
    Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Maki JH, Leiner T, Beek FJ, Korst MB, Flobbe K, de Haan MW, van Zwam WH, Postma CT, Hunink MG, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM, Renal Artery Diagnostic Imaging Study in Hypertension (RADISH) Study Group.
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov 02; 141(9):674-82; discussion 682. PubMed ID: 15520423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Screening for transplant renal artery stenosis in hypertensive recipients using digital subtraction angiography.
    Flechner SM, Sandler CM, Childs T, Ben-Menachem Y, VanBuren C, Payne W, Kahan BD.
    J Urol; 1983 Sep 02; 130(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 6350614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intravenous digital subtraction renal angiography: use in screening for renovascular hypertension.
    Dunnick NR, Svetkey LP, Cohan RH, Newman GE, Braun SD, Himmelstein SI, Bollinger RR, McCann RL, Wilkinson RH, Klotman PE.
    Radiology; 1989 Apr 02; 171(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 2648471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Digital intravenous subtraction angiography as a screening method in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension].
    Baert AL, De Somer F, Wilms G, De Maeyer P.
    Rontgenblatter; 1983 May 02; 36(5):137-40. PubMed ID: 6879060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The accuracy of intravenous digital subtraction angiography regarding kidney arteries in hypertensive patients. A contribution to cost control in diagnostic medicine].
    Lüthi MP, Vock P, Horber FF.
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1993 Aug 31; 82(35):927-33. PubMed ID: 8378674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar 31; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension by intravenous digital subtraction angiography and renal sequential scintigraphy].
    Kempter H, Savaser AN, Felix R.
    Rofo; 1984 May 31; 140(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 6429754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.