These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 6392160

  • 1. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography.
    Barth KH, Mertens MA.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA, Sherry RA.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA, Ellison HP, Bartek S, Vine HS, Palestrant AM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):975-7. PubMed ID: 6601445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA, Gentry LR, Matozzi F, Verma S.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 May; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in contrast enhanced computed body tomography.
    McClennan BL, Lee JK, DiSantis DJ, James M.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 May; 19(6 Suppl):S378-84. PubMed ID: 6392169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preliminary evaluation of Hexabrix for temporomandibular joint arthrography.
    Katzberg RW.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 May; 19(6 Suppl):S387-8. PubMed ID: 6392170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH, Bradley BR, Yegnashankaran S, Enzmann DR.
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM, van den Berg FG, Mulderije ED.
    Diagn Imaging; 1983 Apr; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
    Winfield AC, Maxson WS, Harding DR, Diggs J, Wentz AC.
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography.
    Spataro RF, Fischer HW, Kormano M.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Jul; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
    Fraser AG, Culling W, Singh H, Ruttley MS, Newcombe RG.
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.