These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography. Sacks BA, Ellison HP, Bartek S, Vine HS, Palestrant AM. Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S320-2. PubMed ID: 6392159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. Svenson RH. Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-blind comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in computed tomography. Berland LL. Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S376-7. PubMed ID: 6392168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography. Nelson JA, Sherry RA. Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hexabrix--a new contrast medium in angiocardiography. Cumberland DC. Br Heart J; 1981 Jun; 45(6):698-702. PubMed ID: 7020727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic changes after angiocardiography with a new low osmolar contrast medium (sodium-meglumin-joxaglat). Theler A, Baur HR. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1983 Jun; 9(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 6661772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography. Dray RJ, Winfield AC, Muhletaler CA, Kirchner FK. Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]