These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 6392165

  • 1. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA, Gentry LR, Matozzi F, Verma S.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA, Sherry RA.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography.
    Barth KH, Mertens MA.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Double-blind comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in computed tomography.
    Berland LL.
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S376-7. PubMed ID: 6392168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA, Ellison HP, Bartek S, Vine HS, Palestrant AM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):975-7. PubMed ID: 6601445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-60 in knee arthrography.
    Apple JS, Martinez S, Khoury MB, Royster R, Allen S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 3873834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Smith JR, Horsley WW, Criss E.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Jul; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
    Winfield AC, Maxson WS, Harding DR, Diggs J, Wentz AC.
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.
    Nakstad PH, Bakke SJ, Kjartansson O, von Krogh J.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1986 Jul; 7(2):303-4. PubMed ID: 3082163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM, van den Berg FG, Mulderije ED.
    Diagn Imaging; 1983 Jul; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Anthony CL, Tonkin IL, Marin-Garcia J, Paul RN, Bell ED, Brooks E, Eastham ED, Fowler SL.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Jul; 19(6 Suppl):S335-43. PubMed ID: 6392163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Kieffer SA.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Jul; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
    Fraser AG, Culling W, Singh H, Ruttley MS, Newcombe RG.
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.