These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

290 related items for PubMed ID: 6393760

  • 1. Comparison of a fluorescent immunoassay with an enzyme immunoassay and a radioimmunoassay for gentamicin.
    Lau AH, Chow-Tung E.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Dec; 41(12):2647-50. PubMed ID: 6393760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assay of gentamicin in serum: a comparison of four methods.
    Männistö PT.
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Dec; 4(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 6750280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of an HPLC method with a RIA, EMIT and FIA method for the assay of serum gentamicin with extensive statistical evaluation.
    Hospes W, Boskma RJ, Brouwers JR.
    Pharm Weekbl Sci; 1982 Apr 23; 4(2):32-7. PubMed ID: 7048242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measurements of serum gentamicin concentrations by a biological method, fluorescence polarization immunoassay and enzyme multiplied immunoassay.
    Araj GF, Khattar MA, Thulesius O, Pazhoor A.
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1986 Oct 23; 24(10):542-5. PubMed ID: 3536762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, and microbiologic assay for amikacin in plasma.
    Fukuchi H, Yoshida M, Tsukiai S, Kitaura T, Konishi T.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Apr 23; 41(4):690-3. PubMed ID: 6372450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of an enzyme immunochromatography method for carbamazepine: a comparison with enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Oles KS, Penry JK, Dyer RD.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1989 Apr 23; 11(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 2662480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Evaluation of enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique for gentamicin assay. Comparison with bioassay].
    Sakata H, Takimoto M, Fujita Y, Kitsutaka T.
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1982 May 23; 35(5):1229-32. PubMed ID: 6752460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the Seralyzer and EMIT systems for determination of theophylline concentrations.
    Massoud N, Munzenberger P, Sarniak A.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul 23; 43(7):1722-6. PubMed ID: 3529948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of five immunological methods for the assay of serum netilmicin.
    Van Remmerden C, Brouwers JR, Berk JA, Boskma RJ.
    Pharm Weekbl Sci; 1984 Apr 27; 6(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 6374611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Analysis of caffeine: comparison of the manual enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT), automated EMIT, and high-performance liquid chromatography procedures.
    Miceli JN, Aravind MK, Ferrell WJ.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984 Apr 27; 6(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6390796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Serum gentamicin levels: a comparison between the Syva Solaris and the Syva QST analysers.
    Bearman J, Ellis J, Mortlock S.
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Jun 27; 52(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 8520246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the powder-formulated enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique quantitative single test for gentamicin.
    Berk LS, Imperio N, Eby WC.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1986 Jun 27; 8(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 3515638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Serum aminoglycoside monitoring by enzyme immunoassay, biological, and fluorescence immunoassay procedures.
    Buchanan AG, Witwicki E, Albritton WL.
    Am J Med Technol; 1983 Jun 27; 49(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 6349357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Enzyme immunoassay of gentamicin with use of a centrifugal analyzer.
    Pesce MA, Bodourian SH.
    Clin Chem; 1981 Aug 27; 27(8):1460-2. PubMed ID: 7023751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Abbott TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay analyzer.
    Oeltgen PR, Shank WA, Blouin RA, Clark T.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984 Aug 27; 6(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 6390799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP): monoclonal enzyme-linked immunoassay compared to polyclonal radioimmunoassay.
    Taylor EH, Gadsden RH.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1984 Aug 27; 14(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 6364952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Amikacin assay: correlation between rapid bioassay, enzyme immuno-assay (EMIT) and fluoro-immuno-assay (FIA).
    Damien JM, Courcol RJ, Houdret N, Lhermitte M, Martin GR.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1984 Aug 27; 42(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 6383130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of an immunoassay and a microbiological assay for tobramycin serum concentrations.
    Fukuchi H, Yoshida M, Okihara M, Tokuoka S, Konishi T.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1981 Dec 27; 38(12):1933-6. PubMed ID: 6798863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Gentamicin assay: comparison of an adapted EMIT method and an RIA method.
    Dols JL, van Zanten AP.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1981 Jul 27; 18(Pt 4):236-9. PubMed ID: 7025734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.