These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 641872

  • 21. [Phantom experiments and early clinical experience with a mammogram apparatus using a grid (author's transl)].
    Schreer I, Demelt M, Würthner K.
    Rofo; 1978 Sep; 129(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 151055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Diagnostic significance of high-filtration xeromammography in relation to radiation hazard and image quality (author's transl)].
    John V, Ewen K.
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 675061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Jun; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M.
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Measurement procedures for determining the switch-off dose in mammographic equipment].
    Wahl VH.
    Rofo; 1987 Nov; 147(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 2825295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Dose reduction in mammography.
    Mintzer RA, Matthies HJ, Lin PP, Neiman HL, Rogers LF.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jan 07; 146(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 618496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Clinical experience with mammography using grids (author's transl)].
    Luska G, Nüsslin F, Wagner HH.
    Rofo; 1979 Oct 07; 131(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 159223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F, Smathers RL.
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov 07; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F.
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr 07; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Attachment for mammography of own design (author's transl)].
    Boroń Z, Klucz J.
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1981 Apr 07; 45(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 7312657
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of mammography unit and rare earth screens for high resolution hand radiography.
    Desautels JE, Radomsky JW, Erickson LM.
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Sep 07; 31(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 7419547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [The effect of scatter on film quality in mammography (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M.
    Rofo; 1975 Dec 07; 123(6):556-66. PubMed ID: 129412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.