These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 6436182

  • 1. A randomized double-blind investigation of cefroxadine (CGP 9000) versus cephalexin in urinary tract infection.
    Hess J, Gammelgaard P, Holst B, Rasmussen F, Thomsen VF.
    Infection; 1984; 12(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 6436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Cefroxadine and cephalexin in urinary tract infections. Kinetics of germ elimination].
    Naber KG, Ahrens T.
    Fortschr Med; 1982 Oct 21; 100(39):1827-31. PubMed ID: 6759334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of cepharadine and cephalexin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.
    Mogabgab WJ.
    Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1976 Apr 21; 19(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 4284
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Double-blind comparative trial of cefroxadine and cephalexin in the treatment of acute suppurative otitis media and acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media].
    Baba S, Murai K, Kinoshita H, Kawai T, Koyama K, Tsukiyama M, Maruo T, Wada K, Inagaki M, Matsushita T.
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1983 Sep 21; 36(9):2595-634. PubMed ID: 6361325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of cephradine, a new oral cephalosporin.
    Scholand JF, Hodges GR, Fass RJ, Saslaw S.
    Am J Med Sci; 1974 Feb 21; 267(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 4595266
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An evaluation of cephradine oral suspension in the treatment of bacterial infections of infants and children.
    Lipman RP, Silverman W.
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1977 Sep 21; 16(9):835-7. PubMed ID: 330074
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection.
    Brumfitt W, Pursell R.
    Br Med J; 1972 Jun 17; 2(5815):673-6. PubMed ID: 4555654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cephradine in urinary tract infections: a double-blind comparison with ampicillin.
    Low RA, Clarke TK.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 1975 Jun 17; 3(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 1097196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical comparison of cefadroxil, new oral cephalosporin, and cephalexin in uncomplicated urinary tract infection.
    Bolding OT.
    Urology; 1978 Sep 17; 12(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 360561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Clinical use of Cefroxadine in oral medicine].
    Salvato A, Calderini A, Zambruno E.
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Sep 30; 53(14):115-6, 119-20, 123-4. PubMed ID: 3869543
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Double-blind comparison of carbenicillin indanyl sodium, ampicillin, and cephalexin in treatment of urinary tract infection.
    Ries KM, Cobbs CG, Gillenwater JY, Levison ME, Mandell GL, Sande MA, Kaye D.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1973 Dec 30; 4(6):593-6. PubMed ID: 4602827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.