These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

69 related items for PubMed ID: 644079

  • 1. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA, O'Foghludha F.
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M, Friedrich M.
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C, Wang J, DeBruhl N, Basic M, Bassett LW.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC, Ackerholm PH, Berlin IC, Bjurstam NG, Mattsson SL, Månsson LG, von Schéele C, Thunberg SJ.
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Voltage waveform effects on output and penetration of W- and Mo-anode mammographic tubes.
    O'Foghludha F, Johnson GA.
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Mar; 26(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 7220605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL, Wu X, Barnes GT.
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S, Lillicrap SC, Price JL.
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: a clinical evaluation of rhodium versus molybdenum.
    Monticciolo DL, Sprawls P, Kruse BD, Peterson JE.
    South Med J; 1996 Apr; 89(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 8614878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F, Van Ongeval C, Marshall N, Meylaers T, Michielsen K, Marchal G, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb 21; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep 21; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.
    Rofo; 2007 May 21; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ, DeWerd LA, Pearson DW, Micka JA, Ng KH.
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul 21; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ, Meyer H, Juran R, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Diekmann F.
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct 21; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1994 Oct 21; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines.
    Underwood AC, Law J, Goodman DA, Robinson A, Rust A.
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug 21; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.