These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 6456194

  • 21. Comparative evaluation of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in infertile patients.
    El-Minawi MF, Abdel-Hadi M, Ibrahim AA, Wahby O.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jan; 51(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 145555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertility investigation.
    Fayez JA, Mutie G, Schneider PJ.
    Int J Fertil; 1988 Jan; 33(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2898456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Clinical selection of infertile patients for laparoscopy.
    Portuondo JA, Peña Irala J, Ibañez E, Echanojuaregui AD.
    Int J Fertil; 1984 Jan; 29(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6148322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Acute pelvic inflammatory disease: associations of clinical and laboratory findings with laparoscopic findings.
    Eschenbach DA, Wölner-Hanssen P, Hawes SE, Pavletic A, Paavonen J, Holmes KK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 89(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 9015018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingograms.
    al-Badawi IA, Fluker MR, Bebbington MW.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):953-7. PubMed ID: 10589406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?
    Dhaliwal LK, Gupta KR, Aggarwal N.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999 Nov; 44(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 10499744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Laparoscopic assessment following failure to achieve pregnancy after intrauterine inseminations in patients with normal hysterosalpingograms].
    Jedrzejczak P, Serdyńska M, Brazert M, Pelesz M, Pawelczyk L.
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Aug; 77(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 17076188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [A comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of peritubal adhesions and tubal patency].
    Tanaka T, Fujimoto S, Oikawa M, Sakuragi N, Ichinoe K.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Jan; 39(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 2950187
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography.
    Karasick S, Goldfarb AF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Apr; 152(4):777-9. PubMed ID: 2784261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in evaluation of infertile women.
    Ismajovich B, Wexler S, Golan A, Langer L, David MP.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1986 Feb; 24(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2874076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.