These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 6457577

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computer-based ECG analysis in acute myocardial infarction. A comparison between two computer programs for the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.
    Hulting J, Blomqvist P, Nygårds ME.
    Acta Med Scand; 1977; 201(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 899865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. I. Application to the experimental IBM program of 1971.
    Bailey JJ, Itscoitz SB, Hirshfeld JW, Grauer LE, Horton MR.
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 4276018
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
    Bailey JJ, Itscoitz SB, Grauer LE, Hirshfeld JW, Horton MR.
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrocardiogram computer analysis. practical value of the IBM Bonner-2 (V2 MO) program.
    Garcia R, Breneman GM, Goldstein S.
    J Electrocardiol; 1981 Jul; 14(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 6455484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical experience upon an ECG program with multivariate diagnostic classification.
    Abel H, Zywietz C, Klusmeier S.
    Adv Cardiol; 1978 Jul; 21():168-72. PubMed ID: 145789
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [An ecg-program with multivariate diagnostic classification (author's transl)].
    Abel H, Zywietz C, Klusmeir S.
    Z Kardiol; 1977 Mar; 66(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 140549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Problems in comparing program systems for computer analysis of electrocardiograms].
    Scheidt E, Michaelis J, von Egidy H, Recke S, Lippold R.
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973 Mar; 7():423-8. PubMed ID: 4281849
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Landelius J, Nordgren L.
    Ups J Med Sci; 1979 Mar; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The electrocardiogram as a detector of hemodynamic disorders].
    Bisteni A.
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1977 Mar; 47(4):528-37. PubMed ID: 145208
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs.
    Macfarlane PW, Melville DI, Horton MR, Bailey JJ.
    Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 6450002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of clinicians, the VA program and the Mount Sinai program in the interpretation of electrocardiograms as compared with clinicopathological data.
    Bourdillon PJ, Kilpatrick D.
    Adv Cardiol; 1978 Feb; 21():165-7. PubMed ID: 145788
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.